Review





Similar Products

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/runx2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech runx2
Therapy platform enhances osteogenic potential of senescent BMSCs in vitro . (A) Representative ALP staining images at day 7 (scale bars: top-10 mm, and bot-200 μm). (B) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity ( n = 3). (C) Representative ARS staining images at day 21 (scale bars: top-5 mm and bot-200 μm). (D) Quantification of mineralized matrix formation via ARS staining ( n = 3). (E-H) qRT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers ( Alp , Osx , <t>Runx2</t> , and Opn ) in BMSCs ( n = 3). (I) Representative immunofluorescence images of RUNX2 staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (J) Quantitative analysis of RUNX2 fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Representative immunofluorescence images of OPN staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (L) Quantitative analysis of OPN fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.
Runx2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/runx2/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Runx2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/runx2/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti runx2
In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of <t>RUNX2</t> and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).
Mouse Anti Runx2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti runx2/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech antibodies against runx2
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against runx2/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti runx2 antibody
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Anti Runx2 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti runx2 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti runx2 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against runx2
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Antibodies Against Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against runx2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti ep300
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Rabbit Anti Ep300, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti ep300/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti ep300 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti runx2
Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of <t>Runx2,</t> Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.
Rabbit Anti Runx2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti runx2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti runx2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% skimmed milk (diluted with TBST), the membranes were probed with the primary antibodies for CD90 (1:1000, Cat. ab92574, Abcam, UK), CD146 (1:1000, Cat. ab75769, Abcam, London, UK), CD105 (1:500, Cat. sc18838, Santa, USA), CXCR4 (1:250, Cat. 35-8800, Invitrogen, CA, USA), Na + /K + ATPase (1:1000, Cat. sc28800, Santa, USA), BMP2 (1:1000, Cat. ab284387, Abcam, UK), RUNX2 (1:1000, Cat. 12556, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β -actin (1:10000, Cat. T0022, Affinity, China) overnight at 4 °C, followed by bathing with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Cat. S0002 or Cat. S0001, Affinity, China).

Techniques: In Vivo, Micro-CT, Staining, Expressing

The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% skimmed milk (diluted with TBST), the membranes were probed with the primary antibodies for CD90 (1:1000, Cat. ab92574, Abcam, UK), CD146 (1:1000, Cat. ab75769, Abcam, London, UK), CD105 (1:500, Cat. sc18838, Santa, USA), CXCR4 (1:250, Cat. 35-8800, Invitrogen, CA, USA), Na + /K + ATPase (1:1000, Cat. sc28800, Santa, USA), BMP2 (1:1000, Cat. ab284387, Abcam, UK), RUNX2 (1:1000, Cat. 12556, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β -actin (1:10000, Cat. T0022, Affinity, China) overnight at 4 °C, followed by bathing with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Cat. S0002 or Cat. S0001, Affinity, China).

Techniques: In Vitro, Co-Culture Assay, Staining, Cell Culture, Expressing, Western Blot

Therapy platform enhances osteogenic potential of senescent BMSCs in vitro . (A) Representative ALP staining images at day 7 (scale bars: top-10 mm, and bot-200 μm). (B) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity ( n = 3). (C) Representative ARS staining images at day 21 (scale bars: top-5 mm and bot-200 μm). (D) Quantification of mineralized matrix formation via ARS staining ( n = 3). (E-H) qRT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers ( Alp , Osx , Runx2 , and Opn ) in BMSCs ( n = 3). (I) Representative immunofluorescence images of RUNX2 staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (J) Quantitative analysis of RUNX2 fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Representative immunofluorescence images of OPN staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (L) Quantitative analysis of OPN fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A multimodal ROS logic-gated therapeutic platform disrupts the vicious cycle of senescence to promote aged bone defect repair

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Therapy platform enhances osteogenic potential of senescent BMSCs in vitro . (A) Representative ALP staining images at day 7 (scale bars: top-10 mm, and bot-200 μm). (B) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity ( n = 3). (C) Representative ARS staining images at day 21 (scale bars: top-5 mm and bot-200 μm). (D) Quantification of mineralized matrix formation via ARS staining ( n = 3). (E-H) qRT-PCR analysis of osteogenic markers ( Alp , Osx , Runx2 , and Opn ) in BMSCs ( n = 3). (I) Representative immunofluorescence images of RUNX2 staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (J) Quantitative analysis of RUNX2 fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). (K) Representative immunofluorescence images of OPN staining (scale bars: 50 μm). (L) Quantitative analysis of OPN fluorescence intensity ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Protein expression of RUNX2 (Proteintech, 20700-1-AP; 1:500) and OPN (Abcam, ab63856; 1:500) were detected by immunofluorescence staining on day 14, and fluorescence intensities were quantified using ImageJ software (Media Cybernetics).

Techniques: In Vitro, Staining, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunofluorescence, Fluorescence

In vivo evaluation of the therapeutic platform for aged bone defect repair. (A) Representative 3D-reconstructed micro-CT images of calvarial bone defects in different groups (scale bars: 2 mm). (B-C) Quantification of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) based on micro-CT analysis ( n = 5). (D-E) Representative histological images of H&E staining (D) and Masson's trichrome staining (E). Low-magnification images (scale bars: 500 μm) show the overall defect region, while high-magnification images (scale bars: 100 μm) highlight the new bone (blue box) and defect-host bone interface (red box). Green arrows indicate defect boundaries; FT: fiber tissue; NB: new formed bone; HB: host bone. (F-G) Immunofluorescence images and quantification of RUNX2 expression in defect areas (scale bars: 50 μm, n = 3). (H-I) Immunofluorescence images and quantification of OCN expression (scale bars: 50 μm, n = 3). (J) Schematic illustration of the programmed ROS bidirectional modulation strategy for infection control and repair of aged bone defects, depicting acousto-optic dynamic ROS generation for antimicrobial effects followed by antioxidant modulation to rejuvenate senescent BMSCs and promote aged bone regeneration. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A multimodal ROS logic-gated therapeutic platform disrupts the vicious cycle of senescence to promote aged bone defect repair

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of the therapeutic platform for aged bone defect repair. (A) Representative 3D-reconstructed micro-CT images of calvarial bone defects in different groups (scale bars: 2 mm). (B-C) Quantification of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and bone mineral density (BMD) based on micro-CT analysis ( n = 5). (D-E) Representative histological images of H&E staining (D) and Masson's trichrome staining (E). Low-magnification images (scale bars: 500 μm) show the overall defect region, while high-magnification images (scale bars: 100 μm) highlight the new bone (blue box) and defect-host bone interface (red box). Green arrows indicate defect boundaries; FT: fiber tissue; NB: new formed bone; HB: host bone. (F-G) Immunofluorescence images and quantification of RUNX2 expression in defect areas (scale bars: 50 μm, n = 3). (H-I) Immunofluorescence images and quantification of OCN expression (scale bars: 50 μm, n = 3). (J) Schematic illustration of the programmed ROS bidirectional modulation strategy for infection control and repair of aged bone defects, depicting acousto-optic dynamic ROS generation for antimicrobial effects followed by antioxidant modulation to rejuvenate senescent BMSCs and promote aged bone regeneration. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Protein expression of RUNX2 (Proteintech, 20700-1-AP; 1:500) and OPN (Abcam, ab63856; 1:500) were detected by immunofluorescence staining on day 14, and fluorescence intensities were quantified using ImageJ software (Media Cybernetics).

Techniques: In Vivo, Micro-CT, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Infection, Control

In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of bone regeneration after hydrogel implantation in the mandibular bone defect mouse model. a) Schematic illustration of the mandibular bone defect mouse model. b) Micro-CT 3D reconstruction images of the mandibular bone samples at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 1 mm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of BV/TV, bone surface, Tb.N and Tb.sp (n = 6) in mouse mandibular bone defects implanted with different hydrogels at 8 weeks post-surgery. d) H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining of tissue sections of mandibular defects at 8 weeks post-surgery. Scale bar = 100 μm. e, f) Immunofluorescent staining images and corresponding semi-quantitative analysis of the expression levels of RUNX2 and OCN in mandibular bone defect areas at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: Briefly, tissue sections underwent antigen retrieval (37 °C, 30 min), blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, RT, 1 h), then sequentially incubated (4 °C) with lineage-specific probes: macrophage marker F4/80 (1:200, Cat. sc-52664, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CD68 (1:250, Cat. 14-0681-81, ThermoFisher, USA), CD206 (1:500, Cat. 24595T, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and Arg-1 (1:250, Cat. 82975, Proteintech, China) for a M2 marker, iNOS (1:500, Cat. ab178945, Abcam, UK) and CD86 (1:300, Cat. DF6332, Affinity, China) for a M1 marker, RUNX2 (1:150, Cat. sc390351, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) and OCN (1:150, Cat. sc390877, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for osteogenesis markers, VEGF (1:50, Cat. sc57496, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) and CD31 (1:50, Cat. sc20071, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for angiogenesis markers, and CD146 (1:200, Cat. Ab75769, Abcam, UK) for stem cell surface marker, overnight at 4 °C.

Techniques: In Vivo, Micro-CT, Staining, Expressing

The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: MSC-mimicking nanovesicle embedded bio-adhesive hydrogel for dual immunomodulation and osteogenesis to promote maxillofacial bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.032

Figure Lengend Snippet: The PEG-pp@nMSC@MT hydrogel effectively promotes BMMSCs' osteogenesis in vitro . a) Schematic illustration of co-culture BMMSCs with hydrogels. b) ALP staining of BMMSCs co-cultured with different scaffolds after 7 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. c) Semi-quantitative analysis of ALP staining (n = 3). d) ARS staining of BMMSC co-cultured with different scaffolds after 21 days. Scale bar = 500 μm. e) Semi-quantitative analysis of ARS staining (n = 3). f) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes (BMP2, OCN, and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 5 and 10 days (n = 3). g) Western blot analysis of osteogenic protein (BMP2 and RUNX2) of BMMSCs treated with different hydrogels in the MMP condition after 7 and 14 days. P-values are calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, n.s. not significant ( a was created with bioRender. com).

Article Snippet: Briefly, tissue sections underwent antigen retrieval (37 °C, 30 min), blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, RT, 1 h), then sequentially incubated (4 °C) with lineage-specific probes: macrophage marker F4/80 (1:200, Cat. sc-52664, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and CD68 (1:250, Cat. 14-0681-81, ThermoFisher, USA), CD206 (1:500, Cat. 24595T, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and Arg-1 (1:250, Cat. 82975, Proteintech, China) for a M2 marker, iNOS (1:500, Cat. ab178945, Abcam, UK) and CD86 (1:300, Cat. DF6332, Affinity, China) for a M1 marker, RUNX2 (1:150, Cat. sc390351, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) and OCN (1:150, Cat. sc390877, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for osteogenesis markers, VEGF (1:50, Cat. sc57496, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) and CD31 (1:50, Cat. sc20071, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) for angiogenesis markers, and CD146 (1:200, Cat. Ab75769, Abcam, UK) for stem cell surface marker, overnight at 4 °C.

Techniques: In Vitro, Co-Culture Assay, Staining, Cell Culture, Expressing, Western Blot

Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of Runx2, Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.

Journal: JBMR Plus

Article Title: Follistatin-like protein 1 (FSTL1) modulates bone remodeling and attenuates bone loss in a mouse model of postmenopausal osteoporosis

doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag037

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fstl1 enhances the osteogenic differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A) Representative alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) staining at 7 d. (B) Quantitative ALP activity. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining at 14 d. (D) Quantification of ARS absorbance (OD 562 ). (E-H) Relative mRNA expression of Runx2, Sp7, Ocn, and Opn at 14 d determined by RT-qPCR. (I) Western-blot bands for RUNX2 and SP7. (J and K) Densitometric ratios of RUNX2/GAPDH and SP7/GAPDH. Sample sizes: con ( n = 3), OE-Fstl1 ( n = 3), and sh-Fstl1 ( n = 3). Data are presented as mean ± SD; inter-group comparisons were performed using 1-way ANOVA. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001; ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: Antibodies against RUNX2, SP7, NFATC1, and CTSK were purchased from Abcam, while the anti-GAPDH antibody and anti-FSTL1 antibody were obtained from Proteintech.

Techniques: Staining, Activity Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot